Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Microfinance Under Fire

Microfinance has bored the brunt of some harsh criticism recently, most notably from Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheik Hasina Wazed, and his attacks on 2006 Noble Peace Prize laureate Muhammad YunusAn opinion article on Yunus' unwarranted plight appeared in The New York Times on Monday, March 21:

Anyone who cares about international development, microfinance or social entrepreneurship should pay attention. The Grameen Bank is not just the largest microlender in the world, with 8.4 million borrowers (most of them women villagers) who received more than $1 billion in loans last year, it is the flagship enterprise in an industry that, in 2009, served 128 million of the world’s poorest families. It is also a leading example and inspiration for millions of citizen-led organisations that have been established in recent decades to address social problems that governments have failed to solve.

The Problem: (Bangladeshi) 
Government officials initially seized on a Norwegian documentary that accused Yunus of improperly diverting funds in 1996 that had been donated by the country’s aid agency. The Norwegian government investigated and found that, while funds were transferred internally from one Grameen-owned affiliate to another, there was no indication that the funds were misused. Since then, government officials have engaged in attacks against Yunus and challenged the work of all microlenders in Bangladesh.

Some of these attacks, mind you, have been nasty, vile and wholly undeserved.


a Nobel Prize winner for his work on poverty alleviation has now been called a
"blood-sucker" and his life-long work described as mere entrapment of the poor towards greater indebtedness. In a virulent attack on the man who captured the imagination of the world with his model of collateral-free banking that gives small loans to the rural poor, making illiterate women recipients of 95 per cent of his loans. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina last December accused Prof. Mohammad Yunus of deception, of doing business with the lives of the poor, of treating GB as his personal property, and of misleading the government about his activities.
 
Earlier this month Yunus was forced out of the bank he founded. He has since taken the case to the Bangladeshi Supreme Court.

On March 15, the Bangladeshi Supreme Court postponed ruling on Yunus’s case for two weeks. Hopefully, common sense will win the day and a solution will be reached so that this vital institution — and the millions of villagers who depend upon it for their livelihoods — are not jeopardised.

Bangladesh's Supreme Court adjourned a hearing Tuesday on whether Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, who has fallen out with the government, was illegally removed from his pioneering microfinance bank.

Yunus, who won the Nobel Prize in 2006 for his concept of small cash loans to help tackle poverty, did not attend the hearing, at which he is appealing against a central bank order which sacked him from Grameen Bank.

"Our legal team sought more time to prepare our case and to allow discussions to continue," his lawyer Tamin Husain Shawan told AFP.

"The hearing has been adjourned until April 4. We were seeking a four-week deferment but the Supreme Court turned this down."

The United States warned last week that ties with Bangladesh could be affected if a solution was not found to the clash between the government and Yunus, who is celebrated worldwide for his work helping the poor.

Yunus, 70, was dismissed as managing director of Dhaka-based Grameen Bank last month in what his supporters said was the culmination of a political vendetta against him.

He has defied the central bank order, returning to work at Grameen's headquarters and lodging the appeal contesting his dismissal.

Supporters of Yunus claim the economist was ousted from the helm of his own bank after falling out with Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina when he set up a short-lived political party in 2007.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

RESULTS walks the halls of power

On Monday, February 28 and Tuesday, March 1, members of RESULTS undertook a two day lobbying trip to Canberra to highlight two pressing issues:

  • Tuberculosis in the lead up to World TB Day on March 24
  • Microfinance as it is since a year the new strategy was released
Taniele Gofers, a RESULTS member from Sydney, took part of the journey to the halls of power of Canberra's Parliament House, and recounts her experiences:


I arrived in Canberra on Sunday afternoon, on February 28, for my first trip to to the nation's capital as part of a RESULTS delegation. I was nervous, and excited, but knowing that I was going to be supported (in a way only RESULTS members know how to support each other!) by experienced stalwarts, like Ian Sansom and Maree Nutt, put my mind at ease.

Sunday night was spent planning and practicing our Members of Parliament introductions, and getting to know some of the RESULTS Australia members I hadn't met before. Unfortunately, Jeremy Picone, who had organised many of the meetings, wasn't able to make it after a last-minute illness. In my first year of involvement with RESULTS, I have heard much about Jeremy, and heard his voice on National Conference Calls - but am yet to actually meet him. As a budding conspiracy theorist, my imagination, when he didn't show up in Canberra, was again running wild.

Conspiracy theories aside, Monday morning arrived, and it was time to put our best 'parliamentary' clothes on, and face up to some friendly members of parliament. Walking into Parliament House, as part of a delegation - as part of a group of people who were going to be listened to by our representatives was a powerful experience. It just got better from there!

The meetings over Monday and Tuesday were, on the whole, a roaring success. Many of the parliamentarians agreed to wear a Stop TB badge on World Tuberculosis Day (March 24) and were interested in, and passionate about many of the issues we spoke to them about. Our particular focus was on securing the 0.5 per cent of GNI for international aid, and educating our MP's about a revolutionary new diagnostic tool for TB called Xpert.

The MPs were interested and enthuisastic about our issues - some even agreed to raise a motion in parliament on World TB Day. Going about this process is long and convuluted, but hopefully this will go ahead! 

Fingers crossed, on World TB Day, some members of parliament will speak in support of increased aid for tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment in our region. Knowing that I played some small part in this effort is an empowering experience.

Apart from the meetings, I enjoyed attending question time and wandering around Parliament House. In the week of the debate about the carbon tax, it was endlessly amusing to see Tony Abbott and Julia Gillard go toe to toe on microscopic points of obscure parliamentary 'points of order.' I have watched question time many times on television, but it is definitely more interesting in person - and I think a real eye-opener for some members of the group who perhaps don't spend their days watching ABC Question Time from 2pm till 3pm!

All in all, going to Canberra was a wonderful experience. It was, as usual, great to have such a wonderful and supportive group of people their for my first MP visit.
Can't wait for the next one!